STOP COMMON CORE

STOP COMMON CORE

Saturday, July 12, 2014

Common Core 101...the history behind it!! PART 1

This is a 3rd grade math problem based on common core "reasoning" and abstract thinking for 8 & 9 year olds. I have many new followers following my blog, and they continue to ask me, what is common core? I have never even heard of it...what't the big deal? Why should I be concerned about it?

So here is an attempt at giving you a brief run down about common core. Common Core is a complicated beast...this is a Part 1 of a series it will take me in order to break it down and explain it as simple as possible! Get your "thinking hat" on...

1. Race To The Top (RTTT) Federal Grants were given in exchange for "national education standards" which were voted on and adopted before they were written. A long time teacher and educator details Race To The Top in his blog here:
 http://truthinamericaneducation.com/race-to-the-top/

The US Department of Education RTTT info is here:
http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf

2. No Child Left Behind Waivers were also used as incentive for the Elementary Secondary Education Act which was also adopted (ESEA) you can find all the twisted and complex information about this Federal Law and Mandate here:

http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/obama-administration-sets-high-bar-flexibility-no-child-left-behind-order-advanc


2. In Oklahoma specifically, Common Core was adopted in 2010 via Senate Bill 2033 titled "Teacher Incentive Pay" and only had a couple specific paragraphs pertaining to the standards and the TLE (Teacher Leader Evaluation) system concretes a teacher "teaching to the test". SB 2033 drastically failed the first time (36 YES, and 60 No votes) and then was presented again the same exact day with an emergency and passed (75 YES and 25 NO votes). Legislators were very skeptical and did not understand the bill...many admit it now, saying they regret ever voting for it...biggest mistake.

Please read Senate Bill 2033 (the archive is tough to find and does not have a link) but you can find it through an advanced bill search on the www.ok.gov website under the 2010 Regular Session, type SB 2033 into the search bar. I have copy and pasted it below...

BILL SUMMARY
2nd Session of the 52nd Legislature

                                                                        Bill No.:                                                     SB 2033
                                                                        Version:                    Conference Committee Sub
                                                                        Author:                                          Speaker Benge
                                                                        Date:                                                        5/24/2010
                                                                        Impact:                FY-11 and thereafter: $10,000
                                                                                                                  Annually; $200,000 for
                                                                                                                         Training by FY-14

Bill Summary

Research Analyst:          Dawn Marks


The conference committee substitute for Senate Bill 2033 restores the title and authorizes school districts to establish incentive pay programs for teachers and leaders. Teacher and leader performance shall be measured using the Oklahoma Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Evaluation System, established in the measure and success in improving school, grade level or subject area performance. Awards shall be based upon achieving certain ratings within the system and grade level, subject area or school level performance success.

Districts may develop additional performance pay plans to provide incentives for teachers and administrators in critical shortage areas, low-performing schools or hard-to staff districts.

Incentive pay awards shall not be part of any employee’s continuing contract and awards will be excluded from the process for calculating retirement benefits. Incentives shall not amount to more than 50 percent of a teacher’s salary. The state Board of education must approve or reject plans within 60 days of submission.

Boards of education must adopt the Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Evaluation System by the 2013-14 school year. The system will have a five-tiered rating system, annual evaluations, remediation plans for teachers rated as ineffective, quantitative and qualitative assessment components and an evidence-based qualitative assessment tool. For teachers in grades and subjects for which there are no state-mandated testing measures, an assessment using objective measures of teacher effectiveness including student performance on unit or end-of-year tests shall be used. The measure defines when a teacher shall obtain career status, in three to four years, according to the evaluation system and outlines when teachers and administrators may be dismissed according to the rating system. It also requires districts to dismiss a principal who receives an ineffective rating for two consecutive school years.

A teacher shall receive compensation for 63 days after the filing of the petition for the trial de novo. If the district seeks an extension to the process without the consent of the teacher, the teacher shall continue to receive compensation if the trial continues past 63 days but shall not if the teacher requests extension without the consent of the district. If the district, without the consent of the teacher, asks for an extension beyond the 63 days, and the judge rules the teacher should be reinstated, the teacher shall receive back pay.

Districts shall use the evaluation system as the primary means for determining retention or reassignment of teachers and administrators during reductions in force.

The State Board of Education shall adopt the K-12 Common Core State Standards by August 1, 2010.

A school identified by the State Board of Education as one of the persistently lowest-achieving schools in the state shall adopt one of four intervention models that include staffing changes, converting the school to a charter school or closing the school.

The measure also creates the 19-member Oklahoma Race to the Top Commission to oversee development and implementation of the evaluation system and monitor the flow of federal Race to the Top program funds.


Fiscal Summary

Fiscal Analyst:               Nicole Barnes

The Conference Committee Sub for SB 2033 contains numerous provisions related to incentive pay plans, teacher and leader evaluations, the Due Process Act, curricular alignment, and the Race to the Top Commission.  Regarding incentive pay plans, the measure authorizes salary schedules that reflect new evaluation ratings, increases the maximum incentive pay amount from 20% to 50% of a teacher’s regular salary, and authorizes certain new incentive pay plans. The measure also requires the State Board of Education to adopt a new statewide system of teacher evaluation known as the Oklahoma Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Evaluation System (TLE), including new evaluation components, evaluation frequency, remediation plans, school leader assessments, and system oversight.  The measure also creates the Oklahoma Race to the Top Commission, states the Commission’s purpose, and provides for members’ travel reimbursement.  Furthermore, SB 2033 contains provisions related to the nonreemployment of certain school teachers and leaders, and modifies conditions under which trails de novo take place.  Finally, the measure requires the State Board of Education to adopt revisions by August 1, 2010, to English, Language Arts and Mathematics curricula to align with K-12 Common Core Standards.

Fiscal Analysis

The FY-11 impact relates to travel reimbursement for Commission members and will depend on frequency of meetings and distances traveled, but is estimated to be less than $10,000 annually.  There is no immediate impact associated with the remainder of the measure, as the new statewide system of evaluation can be developed by the State Board of Education with support from the Race to the Top Commission, development of new teacher assessments for subjects and grades that are not currently being tested are not mandatory (they can use existing data), evaluation system training for new personnel is not required until the system is in place at the local level, employment provisions are based on local decisions, and the State Board of Education was already planning on examining state curricular alignment with Common Core Standards. 

School districts may implement the new evaluation system by FY-13, but are not required to until FY-14; therefore the $200,000 estimate for training would be applied in those out years.  The State Board of Education, in conjunction with the Commission, may utilize other sources of funding aside from the state’s to implement the measure’s provisions.

TRICKY LITTLE RASCALS --- Schools R 4 Learning NOT 4 PROFIT!!!

To Be Continued in Part 2 with more fun and exciting information to put inside your "thinking hat!"

No comments:

Post a Comment